Egypt and Rusia



    I have spoken in other occasions about the theory that countries are assigned some sort of angelic administrators who try to conduct that country the best they can, without violating human will, without running over others rights and remaining within the laws ruling the celestial orbs. (It is a difficult task).

    There are also rebellious angels who antagonize with the former in the running of the country, as it also occurs in the life and conduct of a particular individual. In the same way, despite the beneficial conduction of the Holy Spirit and the angels of God over a Christian, the running of this one leaves much to be desired, this is what happens with nations. This occurs because there is an independent factor, human will, which God does not permit one or the other to violate; not even He violates it. If this occurs with Christians, what more occurs with those who are not saved, and the nations?

    Although it is said here it is nothing new for me, if there was it would have been the observation referring with the main nations in history, about the apparent relationship existing between the characteristics of the nations and their patron angels.

    To clarify this concept, I will create a parallel between Pharaoh ruled Egypt and communist Russia, such as was done for me, to explain it to me the first time, basing it on the following factors:

    a) Property, on behalf of the government, of everything that is of value in the nation.

    b) Its system was conceived and put into action by a Jew.

    c) In time the system turns against the Jews.

    d) The country makes enormous mortuary monuments for their rulers.

    e) They try to preserve the corpse of their rulers.

    f) The rulers prohibit leave of the country by its residents.

I will explain everyone one of the clauses above:

    a) In Egypt, Pharaoh was owned the land and livestock; in communism the land also belongs to the state and individually owned livestock does not exist.

    b) The one who gave the idea that the government should own the land and livestock in Egypt was a Jew, Joseph. The one who gave the idea that the state should own everything under communism was another Jew, Marx. The only difference is that, in the first case, the one who put the idea in effect was Joseph himself, and in the second case it was a different Jew, Lenin.

    c) In the beginning, in the time of Joseph as in the time of Lenin, the Jews had certain advantages with the system. In Egypt they had the protection of Joseph. In Russia the Czars persecuted the Jews in their pogroms, and communism attracted and utilized them; but in time, the system turned against the Jews, in Egypt as in the Soviet Union.

    d) The Egyptian pyramids are an existing testimony of the monuments they made to their dead rulers. In Red Square stands the gigantic monument that keeps Lenin's remains, etc.

    e) The Egyptians mummified their rulers. The mummy of Lenin is displayed everyday in front of hundreds of people, in Red Square. Even though the regime has only been established a few decades.

    f) Pharaoh prohibited the Jews from leaving Egypt. The Soviet Union does not permit its residents to travel.


    8 Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph. 9 And he said unto his people: Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we. 10 Come on, let us deal wisely with them; lest they multiply, and it come to pass, that, when there falleth out any war, they join also unto our enemies, and fight against us, and so get them up out of the land.”    (Ex. 1:8-10)

    What I want to show with everything I have said is the great similarities that exist between two regimes that could not have influenced each other because of the amount of time between the two.

    This is attributed to similar patron angels or similar rebellious angels, or both, influencing the two nations, communicating to them their characteristics, or the resulting of all the characteristics.

    It doesn't have to be a regime, a carbon copy of the other, because is to think that, especially the antagonist rebellious angels change their methods or ideas, when by experience realize that the first was not to their convenience. Nevertheless, it is logical that they conserve those techniques that served them to get their way, or that are the result of intense concupiscence of those rebels.

    This could explain why in Ezekiel 28 it is spoken of King Tyre sometimes as if he was a human and others as if he was an angel. It gives you the impression that it is referring to a first class rebellious angel, who was the one who counteracted against the angel of God in Tyre, and who ended up taking over the mind and heart of the people.

    There are other cases of historical similarity. For example, the cruel treatment methods and wars of the Assyrians, their beastliness, their efficiency in war, their militarism, their sadism, etc., seem to be traced, copied by Hitler and the Nazi Germany, although the first could not have influenced in the second. The same happened in Cambodia. The nature of Babylonia, over all religion, was traced by Rome, especially all of Catholicism with its seat in the Vatican.

    Carthage was the image of Tyre; they distinguished themselves because the elite of the economy where the rulers and because their wise and technicians were foreigner attracted by the booming economy that was enjoyed there, like they testified in the case of Tyre, Isaiah 23:8 and Ezekiel 27:1-25. Tyre was destroyed by Babylonia, and its equivalent, Carthage, was destroyed by Rome, which is equivalent to Babylonia.


    Who hath taken this counsel against Tyre, the crowning city, whose merchants are princes, whose traffickers are the honorable of the earth?” (Isaiah 23:8)



    27:1 The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying: 2 Now, thou son of man, take up a lamentation for Tyrus; 3 and say unto Tyrus: O thou that art situate at the entry of the sea, which art a merchant of the people for many isles8 The inhabitants of Zidon and Arvad were thy mariners: thy wise men, O Tyrus, that were in thee, were thy pilots. 9 The ancients of Gebal and the wise men thereof were in thee thy calkers10 They of Persia and of Lud and of Phut were in thine army, thy men of war 25 The ships of Tarshish did sing of thee in thy market: and thou wast replenished (Ezq 27:1-25 abbreviated)

    In a certain time in its history Carthage concerted treaties with Rome over limitation of its heavy armament (catapults, mobile towers, etc.) in exchange for commercial advantages. We get the feeling that the United States is a new edition of Tyre and Carthage that the United Europe is of Babylonia or Rome. The United State has characteristics of Tyre: commerce with all nations, it has many foreigners in its industry, commerce and military; it is very rich, etc…

    Of course these similarities are not exact, and the same things do not have to happen, because we are not dealing with a programmed history, but with a conjunction of similar factors that can bring similar results, but that do not necessarily have to be this way.

    I am not saying that the theory that is exposed here is unquestionably correct, but that what is here expressed has so many facts that appear to confirm it, that it is worth to consider and keep in mind. After all a theory is just that: the assumption of what is the interior dynamic of a phenomenon, based in observation and on confirmation and partial proof of its manifestations. If I could explain everything and prove everything, it would not be a theory, but a proven fact.

    In a few words, the nations have angels that are in charge of them, both good and bad. Every group tries to influence the people, whether they choose to listen to one or the other, the occurrences will develop.

Back to the Index